Hello Suhel. I got it. Thank you so much.
Regards,
Ossie.
Hello Suhel. I got it. Thank you so much.
Regards,
Ossie.
Hi Rohith,
Is you difficulty extracting actual GUID from CRM to BW?
Normally when we extract any GUID from source to BW will encrypted and there is no possibility via standard extractor.
Even if you extracting GUID using generic extractor and it will not helpful in BW.
Thanks,
Shakthi Raj Natarajan
Hello Jay,
From what it looks like there is a process chain scheduled in BW which is running an infopackage and the corresponfding job in ECC. You have to fid the Process chain name and remove it from scheduling in BW.
Here's what you have to do.
Check the job log of the from sm37 at ECC and find the datasource name and Update Mode(F for Full, D for Delta)
Now, at BW.. goto RSA1, At left hand side under modelling goto DataSources.
Now search the datasource name. Expand the datasource and you will find the infopackage that is causing the run in ECC
The possibility is that you will find more than 1 infopackage. i.e. for FULL Load and for delta load. from ECC job log select the corresponding infopackage (F for Full, D for Delta). Now double click the infopackage and select Process Chain maintenance F9.
You will find the process chain name. Now unschedule the process chain from rspc1.
Regards,
AR
Hi
Does db02old helps?
Regards,
AR
No, didnt mean that way.
The field is to show the yield variance only. ie, short or excess.
If there's excess produced than planned, then plus, otherwise negative.
Production team used to identify the data before TECO. In that sense i mentioned it will be zero.
Regarding your query, it will not affect MRP, Costing or settlement.
Hi Mahesh,
In Webi Add the same query twice and apply the filters separately and use merge dimension to combine both the query.
For Eg : Query Z_TEST_QUOO1
Add the query Z_TEST_QU001 twice and add first filter on " '2012-05-01' to '2014-04-30'" and second filter on query2 " 2011-05-01' to '2014-04-30'".
Thanks,
Shakthi Raj Natarajan
Hi Seema,
Check the created date or last changed date of the cubes.
Or check the requests which has filled the cubes. The latest request data may tell you the copy or orignal.
Thanks,
AR
Hi
I’m very sorry that I didn’t write immediately.
I’m working on Windows7 so I used command:
netstat –an |find/i “3900”
Below I wrote meaning of words
Nasłuchiwanie –listening
Ustawiono – set
Alos below I passed dev_ms
---------------------------------------------------
trc file: "dev_ms", trc level: 1, release: "720"
---------------------------------------------------
[Thr 12212] Sun Mar 01 20:48:40 2015
[Thr 12212] ms/http_max_clients = 500 -> 500
[Thr 12212] MsSSetTrcLog: trc logging active, max size = 52428800 bytes
systemid 562 (PC with Windows NT)
relno 7200
patchlevel 0
patchno 101
intno 20020600
make multithreaded, Unicode, 64 bit, optimized
pid 1032
[Thr 12212] ***LOG Q01=> MsSInit, MSStart (Msg Server 1 1032) [msxxserv.c 2278]
[Thr 12212] load acl file = E:\usr\sap\NSP\SYS\global\ms_acl_info.DAT
[Thr 12212] MsGetOwnIpAddr: my host addresses are :
[Thr 12212] 1 : [10.10.0.10] Rafal (HOSTNAME)
[Thr 12212] 2 : [127.0.0.1] Rafal (LOCALHOST)
[Thr 12212] 3 : [169.254.18.16] Rafal (NILIST)
[Thr 12212] 4 : [192.168.0.102] Rafal (NILIST)
[Thr 12212] Sun Mar 01 20:48:50 2015
[Thr 12212] 5 : [169.254.33.98] 169.254.33.98 (NILIST)
[Thr 12212] MsHttpInit: full qualified hostname = Rafal
[Thr 12212] HTTP logging is switch off
[Thr 12212] set HTTP state to LISTEN
[Thr 12212] *** HTTP port 8100 state LISTEN ***
[Thr 12212] *** I listen to internal port 3900 (3900) ***
[Thr 12212] *** HTTP port 8100 state LISTEN ***
[Thr 12212] CUSTOMER KEY: >E0613729770<
[Thr 12212] build version=720.2011.10.26
Hi All,
We are facing authorization problems with ChaRM when used with cCTS. this is working fine for CTS. Now in our production system we have cCTS and so we have many authorization problems.
Challenge is this admin role is wide open and we can not give to all the users.
Has anyone also faced this kind of issue before. If yes then how you solved this. We are stuck with go-live date planned for next week. Appreciate any input in this line. Thanks.
Smita
Dear Sumeet
I hope you are well and many thanks for using the SAP Discussion Threads .
Based upon your description of the scenario it does indeed seem a little strange and behaviour with reference to the issue you are describing:
Ok now the first point to reference here is what you mentioned about the configuration in the XML file.
Secondly regarding the issue in its entirety could you kindly confirm if the UWL Destination Service is configured correctly and there are no exceptions displayed in the status columns of the UWL associated connectors?
Check that after applying Note 1133821 the destination names and the UWL connector names exactly match, even considering case-sensitiveness.If your portal system alias (=UWL connector name) is for example XYZCLNT100, then the rfc destination name should be exactly XYZCLNT100$WebFlowConnector. Please correct the rfc destinationaccordingly. (If Required)
Kindly update me as per your findings.
Kind Regards
Troy Cronin - Enterprise Portal Support Engineer
Follow Troy Cronin
Sorry the message I got while creating a WM TO for a restricted batch is "Transfer of batch xxxxxxx with status "Not available" is not allowed" Message no. L3712.
It does not even allow mvmt via LT01, LT10 within the warehouse.
works fine again.
Thanks a lot!
Best regards
Klaus
Hi,
Are both users having same mobile application(OS version etc) .Also are these systems added as favorites in your app
Also can you check if anything is written to the logs (settings>submit Log).
We can also try to clear the cache and reinstall the app once
Regards,
Murali
Sathish
The rest seems to be pointing you in the right direction, so I'll just chip in only a little bit more.
Your UDF seems to look fine. If the values are not showing in the Dynamic Configuration section, maybe the UDF is not being triggered.
My preferred approach for using DynamicConfiguration UDF in Message Mapping is to use a graphical variable instead of the root node. I would create one just under the root node and give it a name like V_SetFileName, and map the output of the UDF to that variable. It also provides a quick overview when I open a Message Mapping and see it, I know that there is some sort of Dynamic Configuration mapping going on.
Rgds
Eng Swee
Hola David.
El repore HMXCIES0 muestra en el ALV los datos del cluster que fueron calculados en cada nómina. En el caso de CMP, HGO, QRO y cualquier otro estado que sea global (y no individual), los valores correctos se muestran en la forma genérica y no en el ALV.
Saludos!
OI Mateus,
Não existe configuração no GRC para este caso.
O código que preenche esta informação está na include /XNFE/LOUT_NFE_TRANSFORMF01.
ELSEIF ls_nfe_imposto_icms-cst = '40'
OR ls_nfe_imposto_icms-cst = '41'
AND ls_nfe_imposto_icms-v_bcstret IS INITIAL
OR ls_nfe_imposto_icms-cst = '50'.
ls_det-imposto-choice-sequence-icms-choice-selection = 'ICMS40'.
ls_det-imposto-choice-sequence-icms-choice-icms40-orig = ls_nfe_imposto_icms-orig.
ls_det-imposto-choice-sequence-icms-choice-icms40-cst = ls_nfe_imposto_icms-cst.
Você consegue depurar a RFC a partir da /xnfe/nfeout_create? Seria interessante verificar se esta informação está chegando na proxy.
att,
Renan
Hi Denis,
1) Goto to /NSCWM/MON select Stock and Bin then select Handling unit - In search tab enter storage type and execute.
2)You will get all the HU under storage type. Select all the HU item details then click on "More Method" icon you will see Delete HU click on that your work will be done.
Hi Wandy, I´m afraid you don´t have a 1:1 relantionship between your queries, if so, you can try taking a look at Merging queries with a 1 to N relationship . But , in that case I used just two universes..
Perhaps you could post some sample of your data so its easier to understand exactly the issue.
Regards,
Rogerio
Dear Radha
I hope you are well and many thanks for using the SAP Discussion Threads .
With reference to the scenario that you have described you mentioned the following:
Could you kindly review the following SAP Note and check its relevance to ensure I understand the scenario in its entirety.
Kindly update me as per your findings.
Kind Regards
Troy Cronin - Enterprise Portal Support Engineer
Follow Troy Cronin